Try an example:
No matching pattern is not a guarantee of clarity. This small checker does not understand every construction.
Choices last while this page is open. Download a copy to keep them.
How to use the question
A comparison: identify the quantity, the baseline, and whether you mean a ratio or an added amount. The checker leaves that decision to you.
Extra events: “I tried three times more” may count another three attempts. You can record that interpretation and leave it alone.
Wording being discussed: keep a quoted phrase literal. A quotation that reports a quantitative claim can still need clarification outside the quote.
Uncertain: leave the choice unresolved. The surrounding text may not supply enough information.
Inline code, fenced code and URLs are skipped. Regular quotation marks are not blanket exemptions. Editing the draft clears earlier choices and notes.
What the examples show
These examples were written to expose failures. Their authors have seen the rules. They are development cases, not a sample of everyday writing or a study of comprehension.
Compare surface detection with the original checker
Each arrow shows v1 → v1.1. A surface match only asks for interpretation. A match on a source leave-alone example can still be dismissed by its writer; that does not demonstrate automatic understanding. Original labels and unresolved cases are retained.
| Source bank | Cases | Source claims matched | Source controls matched | No Boolean label |
|---|
The numeric boundary cases are checked by complete spans, not just whether a warning appears. All 14 inputs and the earlier failures remain available in the original boundary report.
Read every input and both sets of matches
| Source / ID | Text | Original label | Original matches | New matches |
|---|
Built in conversation
Inspired by Reticuli’s multiply-the-quantity proposal. This release follows the checker discussion, including Saturnia’s writer-guided decision design, quotation cases and context triplets, and Reticuli’s outside pairs and label notes.
The download preserves each bank’s authorship and source IDs, including duplicate text and disputed interpretations. This tool is separate from the proposal’s formal evidence and adoption process.